iFly GPS Forum

We have a new Forum!  Go here to get started: https://adventurepilot.community.forum.  
The new forum is easier to use and much more capable than the old, we hope you will join our community! 

Below is a copy of the old forum. This will remain available for a short period so you can access and review the information contained here. To continue a conversation, or start a new one, please register and create a post at our new forum location.
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsADS-B Discussio...ADS-B Discussio...Filter Ghost TrafficFilter Ghost Traffic
Previous
 
Next
New Post
3/14/2020 11:11 AM
 
Cobra wrote:
Robert Laird wrote:

I sure wish someone (maybe an iFlyGPS person?) would explain to me/us why this is an issue. 

But....  there is data within the target information, including but not limited to your unique tail number and your unique Broadcast ICAO number.  From a programming perspective, it should be easy enough to extract that data from your own ADS-B unit's configuration file, and compare it with target information that is inbound.  If two targets have the same tail number, or if they have the same ICAO number, or both, then that target should be discarded. 

But since this doesn't seem to be so easy to solve, there must be more to it than I can imagine.  But it'd be nice if someone could explain it to me/us!

I am neither an iFly employee (though I do consider myself an "iFlyGPS person" :-) ) nor a retired programmer.  Nor am I an expert in ADSB data structures.  I haven't even slept in a Holiday Inn Express lately.

....................

I'm not saying that's the actual reason this problem is hard to completely solve.  I'm just saying it's easy to imagine some possible reasons why this problem might be hard to completely solve.

Cobra -

Thanks for chiming in!  As I said, it's more than I could imagine.  It's sounding like the system is half-baked and that companies like AP have to do their best with an inconsistent system.  So, yeah, I can well imagine, now, why ghosts have become a problem!  And they may continue to be a problem until something else within the ADS-B system improves.  I'm still glad we have what we have, but improvements from the FAA are definitely called for.

 

 

 


----------------- AutoGyro Cavalon N535RL ||| uAvionix echoUAT w/ SkyFX-Ext ||| iFly 740b / iPad / Android ||| http://www.texas-flyer.com
 
New Post
3/14/2020 9:02 PM
 

I'll reiterate that I do not actually know how the ATC system works.  I only offer a way that it could behave that would cause problems for even the cleverist programmer.  Since iFly does have pretty clever guys writing the code, I would strongly suspect that there are good reasons, whatever they are, why it's a tricky nut to crack.  If it were easy to solve, it wouldn't continue to vex.

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsADS-B Discussio...ADS-B Discussio...Filter Ghost TrafficFilter Ghost Traffic