iFly GPS Forum

We have a new Forum!  Go here to get started: https://adventurepilot.community.forum.  
The new forum is easier to use and much more capable than the old, we hope you will join our community! 

Below is a copy of the old forum. This will remain available for a short period so you can access and review the information contained here. To continue a conversation, or start a new one, please register and create a post at our new forum location.
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsADS-B Discussio...ADS-B Discussio...TSO skyBeacon - Certified AircraftTSO skyBeacon - Certified Aircraft
Previous
 
Next
New Post
8/24/2018 6:23 AM
 

I trust our legal system and belive in the verdict of a impartial jury.

While not perfect, it works almost all the time. The only structural disadvantage in our system is that someone or some company with unlimited resources can sue over and over again with large legal teams against a small company or individual who simply cannot afford it or does not have the bandwidth to fight something like this for years on end...it is called "slamming" and many of you already know what I am talking about.

My preference would be for both companies to survive for the benefit of general aviation - there is enough room for both here...and enough of us on the bottom of the cost/price structure for everyone to make a profit while delivering a product/service we now require in many areas of the nation.

Mike N714AJ

 

 
New Post
8/24/2018 8:58 AM
 

I think we all know what you are talking about.  Yes, it happens.

Companies MUST protect their patents and intellectual property.  They also must protect trademarks and such.  If they don't, they lose them.  Of course, none of us know enough about the patents to make a judgement one way or the other.  However, if this is patent infringement, there is NO REASON Garmin should not agressively pursue this and bring it to a halt.  If it's not patent infringement, the court case will determine that.

Healthy competition is a good thing and helps keep cost to the consumer in line.  However, if the competition is stealing patented technology and/or intellectual property, it cannot and should not be allowed, regardless of the competition factor or effect on the consumer.

 

 
New Post
8/30/2018 6:46 AM
 

Interesting how Garmin seemed to not really care when the SkyBeacon was ONLY for home-builts, experimentals and others...but when it was going to cut into the certified aircraft market, that was going a bit too far....just interesting.

Mike N714AJ

Garmin Sues uAvionix Over ADS-B Patent (Updated)

AVweb Flash- August 2018
Garmin has filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Montana, where uAvionix is based, accusing that company of using Garmin’s patented ADS-B technology without permission. The products under dispute are the EchoUAT and skyBeacon, which are sold for the experimental market.

 
New Post
8/30/2018 11:09 AM
 
Michael Marra wrote:

Interesting how Garmin seemed to not really care when the SkyBeacon was ONLY for home-builts, experimentals and others...but when it was going to cut into the certified aircraft market, that was going a bit too far....just interesting.

Mike N714AJ

Garmin Sues uAvionix Over ADS-B Patent (Updated)

AVweb Flash- August 2018
Garmin has filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Montana, where uAvionix is based, accusing that company of using Garmin’s patented ADS-B technology without permission. The products under dispute are the EchoUAT and skyBeacon, which are sold for the experimental market.

That's not necessarily true. Maybe they filed as soon as they had all the information they needed and the suit in place. Why are you so anti-Garmin? They are trying to protect their business.
 
New Post
8/31/2018 8:24 AM
 

As a customer, I'm anti- anti-competitiveness.  I understand and support the purpose of the patent system--it is designed to promote innovation, and give innovators a window of opportunity to benefit from their ideas and development before everybody and their brother can copy their work.

But patents can also be abused to hamstring legitimate competition and stifle true innovation.  I hope that's not what Garmin is doing here.

I don't know if Garmin's suit has merit or not--hopefully, the courts will figure that out correctly.  But the optics are poor:  Garmin is an 800-lb gorilla, and uAvionix is the little guy, and the case for infringement is not obvious to the layman.

As a customer, my interests are to see the best competition in the marketplace, so I am generally in favor of anyone who wants to go up against the 800-lb gorilla.  

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsADS-B Discussio...ADS-B Discussio...TSO skyBeacon - Certified AircraftTSO skyBeacon - Certified Aircraft