Aircraft Profiles - Knots vs Statute - iFly General Discussions

iFly GPS Forum

We have a new Forum!  Go here to get started: https://adventurepilot.community.forum.  
The new forum is easier to use and much more capable than the old, we hope you will join our community! 

Below is a copy of the old forum. This will remain available for a short period so you can access and review the information contained here. To continue a conversation, or start a new one, please register and create a post at our new forum location.
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...Aircraft Profiles - Knots vs StatuteAircraft Profiles - Knots vs Statute
Previous
 
Next
New Post
5/5/2018 4:49 PM
 

Most pilots and aircraft use knots.  I guess some older aircraft (and pilots) might still use statue mph.  I suggest iFly NOT go to decimals for aircraft speed.  + or minus less than 1 knot or mph is not significant.

 
New Post
5/5/2018 6:39 PM
 

Almost all Light Sport Aircraft, use mph.  Experimental GA too.  And, as you pointed out, some older aircraft.  Together, these are a large percentage of the overall fleet.

I would suggest that iFly just use fractional knots internally. It doesn't have to display them or allow the user to enter them. 

For those reading this who're wondering what Johnny is talking about: try editing an aircraft profile and putting in 80 mph or 88 mph as one of the speeds (such as Cruise Speed).  It gets converted to 81 or 87, respectively.  I pointed that out in the Beta Users forum as a "quirk".  Brian replied that its because iFly keeps everything internally in knots, and asked the Beta Users whether they thought speeds should be enter'able in fractional numbers so iFly would not just store numbers as integers (and since it's storing them as knots, it's losing precision when converting from/to mph and therefore displaying the wrong numbers).

t's not a big deal.  But it's weird to have the software not display what you entered.  I don't think there needs to be the ability to enter a speed as 77.7 mph (or knots), versus 78.  What POH lists speeds out to the decimal points?  But that doesn't preclude the software from using floating point rather than integer for the precision.  Either that or keep a flag to indicate whether a number is stored as knots or mph.


Powrachute PC 2000; Aventura II; Cherokee 180
 
New Post
5/5/2018 7:26 PM
 

I disagree that most LSA use statute mph.  And, I don't know any pilots that use statute, although I'm sure there are some that do.  Brian asked for our opinion and I gave it.  Thanks.

 

EDIT: Actually, Brian didn't ask our opinion.  That was another issue.  Anyway, I wouldn't spend much time on this.  I think it's perfectly fine as is for the reasons I posted above.  It's inconsequential if you're planning 87 knots or 88.  However, it the issue can be resolved easily, then go for it.

 
New Post
5/5/2018 7:34 PM
 

I use knots (not mph) in my light sport and believe that to be be typical among all my acquaintances who fly light sport aircraft.

Jim B

 
New Post
5/6/2018 7:53 AM
 

Opposite of my experience in all five LSA's I've flown, and the two Experimentals I've flown.  But it doesn't really matter.  We have established that there are planes that use MPH and planes that use KPH, as well as planes that use KTS.  And I'll stipulate that KTS is probably predominant.  But that's beside the original point.  That point being that if the user enters a number in any field, the software ought not to seemingly override that number. At least not without explanation.  It appears to the user to be a bug, even if it is not. 


Powrachute PC 2000; Aventura II; Cherokee 180
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...Aircraft Profiles - Knots vs StatuteAircraft Profiles - Knots vs Statute