OldPilot wrote:That is location, not altitude. Again, think about the geometry. You're asking a couple satellites 22,000 miles overhead to triangulate your altitude by looking almost straight down on you.
To be clear, the issue is not about accuracy of the system in general. Panel-mounted WAAS GPS systems (i.e., Garmin 430W, Avidyne IFDt540, etc.) are certified to support LPV approaches to minimums equal to an ILS (200' and 1/2 mi vis) because the WAAS-supplemented GPS altitude is accurate enough to support those minimums.
The issue is about how accurate a non-certified, portable solution like an iFly or an iFly + a non-certified GPS source like from a SkyGuardTWX receiver is.
Part of the certification criteria for the panel-mounts involves lots of testing with specific GPS antennas, specific antenna placement on the aircraft, specific antenna cable requirements, etc., etc. to ensure consistently reliable signal integrity.
As Walter pointed out, the portable installations don't involve any of that, and so the signal is not as reliable.
So signal integrity of portable GPSs is really the primary concern, not any inherent weaknesses in the WAAS GPS system itself.