iFly GPS Forum

We have a new Forum!  Go here to get started: https://adventurepilot.community.forum.  
The new forum is easier to use and much more capable than the old, we hope you will join our community! 

Below is a copy of the old forum. This will remain available for a short period so you can access and review the information contained here. To continue a conversation, or start a new one, please register and create a post at our new forum location.
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...CDI with Glideslope?CDI with Glideslope?
Previous
 
Next
New Post
6/17/2014 11:11 AM
 

I'd just like to echo Flyright's experience. Anywhere map had this feature and it was just a really nice additional cue that your approach was being flown well. I never once used it with low visibility or as primary guidance, but I really loved having it available to me.

 
New Post
6/18/2014 6:33 PM
 

TSO'd Garmin WAAS navigators provide advisory vertical guidance on at least some approaches while non-WAAS boxes do not. It is kind of a cute trick but I tend to towards the dive and drive school of thought so for me they are mostly a reference to make sure I'm getting the dive right.

Remember, folks, that real ILSs do not all have the same approach angle. If I am reading the TERPS correctly (Ch. 2, Para. 244), angles can vary from 2.75 to 3.77 degrees on civilian approaches. If the approach calls for a high angle and the cockpit "situational awareness" box provides a TERPS "optimum" three degrees, things could get very exciting.

I think AdventurePilot' best course of action, paraphrasing Peter Lynch, is to "Go for a product that any idiot can run -- because sooner or later, any idiot probably is going to run it."

If we're voting, I vote no.

 
New Post
6/22/2014 8:02 PM
 

If the runway you're approaching has a PAPI or VASI, perhaps you could use the glideslope information published for that instead of using a static glide path.

 
New Post
6/26/2014 3:04 PM
 

> " Pilots are responsible for their flights. It is not incumbent upon others to hold our hands."

Of course. True in life as well as in the world of aviation.

This V-ILS feature simply can be left turned off if someone is not "adventurous" or curious enough to practice with it during normal VFR flying to gain sufficient confidence in its utility.

Wouldn't it be nice when flying VFR-on-top to know you can get yourself safely and easily to any of the nearest runways in case of engine failure?

The V-ILS has nothing to do with any established ILS with their angles, nor with any visual approach aids such as VASI's or PAPI's. It gives you course and descent guidance to the threshold of any airport in the database. You set your own descent angle based on surrounding terrain or whatever one feels comfortable with. 5° (or even steeper) was/is no problem at all. If you've got a dead engine the approach is going to be steeper than a normal ILS glideslope would be, plus a steep angle is insurance against terrain or obstructions, generally speaking. I normally used a 5° glideslope angle when using the ATC V-ILS (before AWM turned it into a sales gimmick, after which it was unusable).

What's not to like about such a fun and potentially life/plane-saving feature?

Mike

 
New Post
6/26/2014 3:19 PM
 

.......

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...CDI with Glideslope?CDI with Glideslope?